SOS Spring Faculty Assembly meeting
Faculty Present: Dean Bart Ng, Dean Pam Crowell, Dean Andy Gavrin, Steve Randall, Jane Williams, David Stocum, James Murphy, Jyoti Sarkar, Kathy Johnson, Andy Barth, Yao Liang, Kathy Marrs, Gary Bond, Martin Bard, Sapna Deo, Robert Minto, Pat Clark, Richard Li, Silvia Bigatti, Barry Muhoberac, John Watson, Kathy Licht, Soren Svanum, Stephanie Sen, John Kremer, Bonnie Blazer-Yost, , Snehasis Mukhopadhyay
Monday, April 28 - 10- 11:am
1) President Steve Randall called the meeting to order at 10:05 am. After noting one change to the Feb 4th faculty assembly minutes, the previous meeting minutes were approved. The agenda was also approved.
2) Dean Ng provided his comments related to the state of the school. First he wanted to thank everyone for their well wishes. He also expressed his thanks to Bill Bosron for the wonderful position that he left the School of Science in. To date Bart Ng has met with about 65 faculty from the School of Science and he will meet with the rest over the next several weeks.
3) Dean Ng provided some data from the Delaware project that shows fairly clearly how the School is being differentially supported compared to others (Liberal Arts and Engineering). He noted how the stability of the budget is striking and suggested that RCM is not operating as intended. The goal is for the University to identify targets for budgeting the SOS in the next few years.
4) Some specific issues he is looking at in the School are graduate student funding, lab fee distribution, ICR distribution, the schools return on start up costs, and long term funding of centers. He was and expects the faculty to play a central role in the budget process and will create a budgetary affairs committee within the school.
5) Dean Ng has asked chairs to identify peer departments that we can use as benchmarks to evaluate ourselves and to use as goals. They are collecting baseline data on these departments (# of faculty, graduate students, etc.).
6) As part of the master planning process, Dean Ng, the Associate Deans, Chairs and faculty reps will visit the Bloomington campus on May 19th and 20th. The goal will be to infuse our thinking about how to create research space in the new Innovation Center.
7) A short discussion was held on why the SOS has historically not been funded at the level of other schools.
8) Dean Ng announced that the replacement for Dean Pam Crowell is ongoing and that it should be finished shortly so that there will be some overlap between Dean Crowell and her replacement. Bart took this time to publicly thank Pam for her strong work over the last 3 ½ years and noted how improved the school is under her leadership.
9) Dean Crowell provided a report from her office – External funding is up 30% above where we were last year at this time. This is notable given we have a quarter to go in the year and we have fewer faculty. Two new signature centers have been funded within the school : Assertive Community Treat (ACT) Center – Michelle Salyers (Psychology) and the Membrane Biosciences Center. The research committee met last week and Anna Malkova (Biology) was awarded the research award. Winners of the Summer PRF awards will be announced soon. And 6 of the 7 International Travel Awards have been given. A call will go out for the last award. The NSF K-12 grant will fund 11 graduate students (half from medicine, half from science). These students will conduct research and will go out into the communities to work within the school systems. Two formal degree programs are making progress to the IHEC – the PhD in Biostastics and the MS in Forensic Sciences.
10) Dean Gavrin provided a report from his office. Creidt hours are up in both the graduate and undergraduate areas – about 1000 hrs. total. The school has admitted 551 students (22% higher than last year) – the quality of the students is quite high. It is uncertain of course how many of these students will actually come to IUPUI .Graduation is coming up onSunday, May 11th, the IUPUI ceremony will be at 3 pm and the SOS ceremony will be at 5 pm.
11) Steve Randall talked for a minute about the letter that the Faculty endorsed and sent to the Faculty Council. He felt that it is having an impact and is part of the backdrop of a lot of the current conversations. He announced that Jyoti Sarkar will be the next SOS Faculty Secretary.
12) Kathy reviewed the committee report for the Undergraduate Education Committee (see attached).
13) The meeting was adjourned at 11:27 a.m.
Report of the
Nominations and Awards Committee
SOS Faculty Assembly
April 28, 2008
David L. Stocum,
Chairman
The Nominations and Awards Committee met in October, 2007, to formulate its plan of action, and in January and March, 2008, to select student and faculty awardees. The student awards at the level of the SOS were given out at the Spring Honors Convocation in April, 2008. Faculty awards will be given out at the Fall Convocation, 2008.
The Committee took up two issues during its deliberations. One was how to accommodate students who were part of non-departmental programs in the selection process. This issue was resolved by simply treating those students as part of the same application pool as departmental students, while noting that they would be evaluated by a Committee composed entirely of departmental representatives. The issue of whether or not to add faculty representatives from interdisciplinary programs must be addressed at a bylaws change level.
The second issue involved the Faculty Research Award. There is only one award, and it is difficult at times to decide between a more senior investigator who has a record of steady research contributions over the years, and a younger investigator (Assistant Professor level) who is making major contributions to the development of a “hot” new research area. The Committee recommended that this be resolved in the future by recommending to the dean the establishment of two Research Awards, one for senior investigators (Associate and Full Professor level) and junior investigators (Assistant Professor level).
School of
Science
Educational
Policy Committee Report
(Undergraduate
Education Committee*)
Academic Year 2007-2008
Kathleen A. Marrs
April 28, 2008
The Educational Policy Committee
(Undergraduate Education Committee*)
has the primary responsibility over the curriculum and academic standards for
the School of Science. Among its
responsibilities this committee shall:
i) receive, review, initiate, or make recommendations to the Faculty concerning matters related to academic policy within the School of Science,
ii) approve or disapprove of all courses to be added, dropped or significantly changed by any Department in the School of Science and report such action to the Faculty in a timely fashion,
iii)
conduct a continuing review of the
educational policies of the School of Science in relation to the policies of
other units of the university and the university as a whole.
*It is to be noted that a name change to
this committee took effect during the academic year. Further discussion is
requested to approve a name more consistent with the committee’s charge.
Committee members, 2007-2008
Academic Year:
Phil
Fastenau, Psychology
Kathy
Marrs, Biology (Committee Chair)
Barry
Muhoberac, Chemistry and Chemical Biology
Mihran
Tuceryan, Computer and Information Science
Mike
Penna, Mathematical Sciences
Jeff
Swope, Earth Sciences
Steve
Wassall, Physics
Non-voting committee members and
staff aide:
Andy
Gavrin, Dean’s Office
Pam
Crowell, Graduate Affairs, Dean’s Office
Joseph
Thompson, Staff Aide to the Committee, Dean’s Office
CSCI 549 Intelligent Systems. Course previously approved in
the IU system, but not the PU system.
1.
CSCI-C591
Research Seminar for First Year Graduate
Students.
2.
FIS
250 Photography at a Crime Scene I.
3.
FIS
251 Photography at a Crime Scene II.
4.
FIS
260 Scientific Digital Imaging I.
5.
FIS
261 Scientific Digital Imaging II.
6.
FIS
415 Forensic Science and the Law.
7. GEOL-G116 Our Planet and its Future - A “matching course” request to an
existing course taught at IU Bloomington
8.
GEOL-G250
Water and Environmental Issues in Earth
Sciences.
9.
MATH
165 Analytical Geometry and Calculus I
10. MATH-S165 Honors Analytic Geometry & Calculus I
11. MATH 166 Analytical Geometry and Calculus II
12. MATH-S166 Honors Analytic Geometry & Calculus II
13. MATH 171 Multidimensional Mathematics
14. MATH 266 Ordinary Differential Equations
Note: Areas where the additions and changes to MATH
165, 166, 171, 261, and 266 change programs are listed below under Approved
Program / Degree changes.
2.
CSCI
230 Computing I no longer requires
calculus. By removing MATH 163 as a
prerequisite, this will allow more flexibility in course scheduling sequences.
3.
CSCI
340 Discrete Computational Structures
change in prerequisites from CSCI 240 to CSCI 230.
4.
MATH
261 Multivariate Calculus Changes
better reflect new prerequisites, sequencing of courses and course content
5.
FIS
490 Forensic Science Capstone change
in variable credit hours from 1-4 to 1-5 to accommodate accreditation
requirements. (Siegel)
Forensic and Investigative
Sciences: To meet current Accreditation Standards, the
Forensic and Investigative Sciences (FIS) program will make the following
changes to their program:
FIS
minimum GPA requirement change in Area IIIC, IIID, IVA (FIS courses) - No grade
below C will be accepted in any FIS course. This corresponds to Area IV A and
reflects a similar policy followed by the Department of Chemistry and Chemical
Biology.
Chemistry and Chemical Biology. Change in chemistry credit hour
requirement for the B.A. and B.S. degrees in chemistry.
1.
With
the above addition of CHEM-C310 Analytical
Chemistry and a reduction in CHEM-C311 Analytical
Chemistry Lab from 2 credit hours to 1 credit hour, the total net chemistry
courses credit hours required for a B.A. degree will increase from 32 to 33.
2.
With
the above addition of CHEM-C310 Analytical
Chemistry and a reduction in CHEM-C311 Analytical
Chemistry Lab from 2 credit hours to 1 credit hour, the total net chemistry
courses credit hours required for a B.S. ACS Certified degree will increase
from 45 to 46.
3.
Change
in chemistry credit hour requirement for the B.A. and B.S. degrees in
chemistry. (Muhoberac)
a)
B.A.
Chemistry degree change. (1) Dropping the CHEM-C325 Introductory Instrumental Analysis course and substituting in its
place CHEM-C410/CHEM-C411 Principles of
Chemical Instrumentation with Lab. (2) Dropping the CHEM-C495 Capstone in Chemistry, but still
requiring CHEM-C494 Introduction to
Capstone. The B.S. ACS Certified
will still require both C494 and C495.
b)
With
the above addition of CHEM-C310 Analytical
Chemistry and a reduction in CHEM-C311 Analytical
Chemistry Lab from 2 credit hours to 1 credit hour, AND with the deletion
of the CHEM-C495 requirement, the net chemistry credit hour change for the B.A.
degree is zero (0).
c)
With
the above addition of CHEM-C310 Analytical
Chemistry and a reduction in CHEM-C311 Analytical
Chemistry Lab from 2 credit hours to 1 credit hour, the total net chemistry
courses credit hours required for a B.S. ACS Certified degree will increase
from 45 to 46.
Mathematics: Areas where the additions and
changes to MATH 165, 166, 171, 261, and 266 change programs:
a)
Program
changes with the reduction in credit hours for MATH 165 and MATH 166 are in
Geology B.S., Mathematical Science B.S., and Physics B.S.
b)
Biotechnology
B.S., Chemistry B.A., Environmental Science B.S., Forensic Science B.S.,
require MATH 221 and MATH 222, both at 3 credit hours. Though MATH 165 and MATH 166 will satisfy
these requirements, there is no net credit hour change in the programs.
c)
Program
changes with the inclusion of MATH 171 are in the Chemistry B.S. ACS, Computer
Science B.S., Mathematical Science B.S., and Physics B.S.
MATH 361
Introduction to Ordinary Differential
Equations; course no longer justified.
The Committee supported replacing
the undergraduate admission’s class rank criterion with a 3.0 grade point
average requirement, as fewer high schools supply class rank.
GEOL-G135 Indiana Geology and GEOL-G136 Indiana
Geology Laboratory was approved as an option with laboratory in Area IIIC
Physical and Biological Sciences for science majors outside the Department of
Earth Sciences.
GEOL-G116 Our Planet and its Future will not count towards Area IIIC Physical
and Biological Sciences.
GEOL-G250 Water and Environmental Issues in Earth Sciences was approved to
count as a lecture only in Area IIIC Physical and Biological Sciences for
science majors outside the Department of Earth Sciences.
PHST-P330 Philanthropy, Calling, and Community was
not approved as an exception course applicable to the List H Humanities or List
Social Sciences requirement.
PHYS 200 Physical Environment will not be allowed to count towards Area IIIC
Physical and Biological Sciences, but may be used as a general elective.
A review of advising processes
throughout the School of Science.
A review of the Jr Sr Integrator
course options across departments in the School of Science
Internship opportunities, as the
campus is moving to a more unified system of posting opportunities on the Web.
Science teacher
education programs and plans of study in Biology Education, Chemistry
Education, Earth Science Education and Physics Education.
Effect of increasing enrollments
on advising and Windows on Science sections
There was a recommendation that
the charge of the Educational Policy Committee be changed to reflect only
undergraduate course requests and policies.
It was recommended that the Graduate Affairs Committee review and
approve graduate course requests, program changes, and policies. The two Committees would jointly review
requests that span both undergraduate and graduate affairs. A name change to the “Undergraduate Education
Committee” was approved by the faculty.
Upon discussion, there was a
unanimous vote by the 7 voting members of the Educational Policy Committee to
request a change the name to the “Undergraduate Educational Policy Committee”
to accurately reflect its mission. The
steering committee will be consulted to act upon this request.
Meeting
Dates
Meeting dates for the fall 2007
semester were September 26, October 1, November 5, and November 26. The
Meetings for the winter/spring semester were March 4, March 28 and April 3 with
an additional date pending.
Prepared by
Kathleen A. Marrs
(Chair) and Joseph L. Thompson (Staff Aide)
April 28, 2008
Technology Committee Report Spring 2008
Presented 4/28/08
A. Gavrin, Chair
Purpose: To make recommendations to the Dean for the use of
student technology fee money, and to discuss and recommend technology strategies
for the School of Science
As reported last Fall, the Student
Technology Fee (STF) Budget is being handled significantly differently than it
has in the past. The decision to undertake these changes was made by Interim
Dean Bosron, in consultation with Associate Dean Gavrin, the members of the
Technology Committee, and the department chairs. The purpose
of the changes are
1. Increased transparency
2. Bringing STF spending priorities into line with practices
common to other IUPUI units
3. Protecting the STF funds from being “swept” into deficit
reduction as occurred in 2006-07 Details of the changes were given in the Fall report. As a result of these
Changes, the work of the committee was rather
different than it has been in recent years, particularly regarding the timing
of decisions. The work of the committee since Fall was approve the structure of
the budget, and to solicit proposals for the use of STF funds by individual departments
and other subunits of the school. A summary of the final budget is attached.
Also attached is a comparison of SoS spending by category to average spending
by other units on campus. Campus spending data is based on reports to IMIR by
the individual units.
A. Student Tech Fee
Allocation (Estimate) $648,000
B. Carryover from
Prior Year 0
C. Total Spendable
Allocation (A+B) $648,000
D. Department Budgets $80,000
Per Department = $11,429
E. General Maintenance
School Items $9,500
F. Tech Support
Salaries and Benefits $257,730
G. Software licenses $23,011
H. SL 070, LD225
Computer clusters and testing center $156,399
I. Lifecycle costs
(outside SL070, LD225) $24,000
J. Total Preapproved
Items (sum D-I) $550,641
K. Amount held until
Spring 2008 $32,000
L. Amount initially
available for allocation (C-J-K) $65,359
M. Funded Proposals
(round 1) $46,789
N. Amount available
for Spring Allocation (K+L-M) $50,570
Spring O. Spring Allocations $28,400
C. Total Spendable
Allocation (A+B) $648,000
P. Projects total
(M+O) $75,189
J. Fixed Cost Total
$550,641
Q. Total Expenditures
$625,830
R. Fund Balance
$22,170
Income Annual Summary
School of Science
Student Tech Fee Budget - 2007-2008
Draft 7/11/07
Costs: Fall allocation
Fall Summary
Cost
percent of total Cost percent of total
Discipline-specific
hardware and software $98,200 15.2% $442,585 10.6%
Computer
workstations, servers, networks, printers, etc. for the (STCs) $92,740 14.3%
$640,360 15.3%
Paper
and other supplies for the STCs $3,000 0.5% $102,022 2.4%
STC
consultants and other personnel $317,548 49.0% $1,670,522 40.0%
Video,
audio, graphic, and other equipment and supplies $0 0.0% $104,403 2.5%
Classroom
or general AV equipment $0 0.0% $123,978 3.0%
Field
labs and experiences $0 0.0% $17,099 0.4%
Maintenance
and repair of student-used equipment $94,500 14.6% $151,027 3.6%
STC
and other facility improvements (including furniture) $0 0.0% $90,000 2.2%
Training
(and support) for faculty and students $0 0.0% $69,838 1.7%
Contractual
obligations for shared $600 0.1% $484,304 11.6%
Administration,
contingencies, reserves $0 0.0% $182,441 4.4%
Other
(Please Describe) (space assesssment) $19,241 3.0% $96,779 2.3%
carryover
to next year $22,170 3.4% ?
total
$648,000 $4,175,357
School
of Science 2007-08 IUPUI 2006-07 Averages
Library Committee
The SOS Library Committee met
several times this year to respond to the problem of inflated serial/journal
prices, and to determine the allocation of book (monograph) money to
departments. Although the SOS initially was charged with cutting $150,000 from
the serials budget, in Spring, 2008 Dean Sukhatme intervened and requested that
the University Library utilize funds in its reserve account to prevent these
cuts from being made. In April, the Library Committee voted NOT to make cuts
this year, although several departments may choose to cut a subset of their
titles in order to, a) initiate new subscriptions, and/or b) pay for an
electronic access ‘upgrade’ with the Elsevier publishing company. The committee
also voted to continued using the standard algorithm for book funds, even
though the book budget was cut approximately in half since last year. This
algorithm sets 50% of the available budget as ‘base’ and then allocates the
remainder of funds based on the number of faculty in each department, and the
numbers of credit hours taught at the 300, 400, and graduate levels.
Assessment Progress
Table for School of Science Departments
Created by Drew
Appleby, Chair of the School of Science Assessment Committee
As the Chair
of the School of Science Assessment Committee, my aspiration for the 2007-2008
school year is to accomplish the following three goals.
1.
To
have the representatives of the eight academic units determine where their
departments currently exist in the six-stage assessment process presented in
the left column of the table below. Progress should be indicated with an A for Accomplished, a P for In-the-Process of
Accomplishing, and an N for
Not-Yet-Accomplished.
2.
To
have each department accomplish at least the next stage in this process during
the 2007-2008 school year.
3.
To
have each department write its 2007-2008 Annual Assessment Report by describing
(a) the stages it has accomplished in the past and during the 2007-2008 school
year, (b) how it will use what it learned from these activities to increase
student learning , and (b) how it plans to accomplish the next stage during the
2008-2009 school year.
|
|
Biology |
Chemistry |
Computer Science |
Earth Science |
Forensic Science |
Mathematics |
Physics |
Psychology |
|
Stage #1 à Identify
student learning outcomes (SLOs) of the department or program. |
A |
N |
A |
A/P |
N |
A |
A |
A |
|
Stage #2 à Link the
SLOs to specific components in the curriculum (i.e., curricular or
extracurricular activities). |
A/P |
N |
A/P |
A/P |
N |
P |
N |
A |
|
Stage #3 à Identify
existing methods or create new methods to measure the SLOs. |
P |
N |